Explore our latest KGS Report to discover how festivals influence GDP, transform industries, and offer powerful insights for policymakers and businesses worldwide.

It's a compelling read on how culture and economy move in perfect harmony.

1. Why Valuation Is Required — and What It Drives

ESOP valuation serves two distinct but equally important purposes.

For tax purposes, FMV on the date of exercise determines the perquisite value in the hands of the employee and therefore the TDS the company must deduct and deposit. It also becomes the employee's cost of acquisition for capital gains when shares are eventually sold.

For accounting purposes, the fair value of the option at the date of grant determines the ESOP expense that the company must recognise in its P&L over the vesting period under the accounting standards.

These are two separate valuation exercises, governed by different frameworks, requiring different methodologies and often confused as one. Keeping them distinct is the first step to getting ESOP compliance right.

2. Valuation Methodology

The choice of methodology must be appropriate and internationally accepted. Internationally accepted methodologies commonly applied include:

• Income Approach
• Market Approach
• Asset Approach
• Option Pricing Models

The methodology selected must be well-documented, consistently applied across reporting periods, and defensible under regulatory scrutiny.

3. Point of Taxation — A Two-Stage Reality

ESOPs are taxed at two distinct stages, and the company carries compliance obligations at both.

Stage 1 — On Exercise (Perquisite Tax): The spread between FMV on the date of exercise and the exercise price is treated as a perquisite and taxed as salary income. The employer is required to deduct TDS and deposit it to the government on behalf of the employees, it’s similar to salary taxation.

Example: FMV = ₹600/share, Exercise Price = ₹50/share → Taxable perquisite = ₹550/share, taxed at the employee's applicable slab rate.

Stage 2 — On Sale (Capital Gains Tax): When shares are eventually sold, capital gains tax applies on the difference between the sale price and the FMV on the date of exercise, which becomes the employee's cost of acquisition.

4. Accounting Impact — The Hidden P&L Charge

ESOPs are not off-balance-sheet item. Under the accounting standards, companies must Fair Value the option as on the date of grant and recognise the expense component in the books, spread over the vesting period. This is a non-cash charge, but it directly reduces reported EBITDA and profit after tax, and must be disclosed in the financial statements with full supporting assumptions.

The inputs to the option pricing model like expected volatility, risk-free rate, dividend yield, expected option life etc. must be consistent, documented, and reviewed each reporting period. Errors in these computations are among the more common causes of financial restatements in high-growth companies and attract heightened scrutiny from auditors.

5. Key Considerations Before Audit Finalisation

Before closing the books, companies should run through a structured ESOP checklist covering the following:

• Grant date fair value: Has the fair value of all options granted during the year been computed using an appropriate internationally accepted methodology, with clearly documented assumptions?
• Expense computation: Has the ESOP charge been correctly calculated, accounting for new grants, forfeitures, cancellations, lapses, and any modifications made during the year?
• Vesting schedule accuracy: Are service conditions and performance conditions correctly tracked, and do they align with the expense recognition pattern applied in the books?
• Disclosure adequacy: Do the financial statement notes adequately disclose option movements, remaining contractual life, and the key assumptions used in fair value computation?

6. Conclusion

ESOP valuation is an ongoing financial discipline — not a one-time compliance event. It touches tax and accounting compliance in equal measure, and gaps in any one area can lead to issues at the time of audit or regulatory reviews. What often goes wrong is not ignorance of these rules, but the absence of a structured process to apply them consistently across every grant cycle and exercise event.

• Goods exports: 15 months from shipment date
• Service exports: 15 months from invoice date
• Warehouse exports: 15 months from date of sale
• INR-denominated exports: 18 months from invoice or transaction date
• Advance payment shipment window: 3 years from date of advance receipt (previously 1 year)

If you are still working off the old nine-month rule, that has been superseded. The extension reflects ground-level commercial reality: disputes happen, logistics get complicated, and overseas buyers do not always pay on schedule.

Longer timelines do not mean lower scrutiny. RBI still expects you to either collect within the window or have a documented, bank-supported explanation for why you did not.

2. When You Need More Time: Filing Form ETX

Form ETX and the Formal Extension Route

When collection delays exceed what your AD Category-I bank can approve under its own delegated authority, the matter moves to RBI through a formal application — Form ETX, submitted in duplicate via your AD bank.

What to submit alongside the form:

• Invoice-wise and shipping-bill-wise statement of all unrealised export dues
• Original buyer or correspondent bank correspondence documenting follow-up history and reasons for non-payment
• Bank evidence of any partial realisations received against the outstanding invoice
• Settlement agreements or legal records, where proceedings have been initiated
• A CA-certified schedule, if your AD bank requires it prior to forwarding the application to RBI

Practical Tips

Banks respond very differently to a well-organised, proactive extension request versus a retrospective one filed under pressure. The moment an invoice begins ageing — not when the deadline is in sight — is the right time to start building the documentation file. Correspondence logs, follow-up emails, buyer acknowledgements, and any partial payment records should be collated as they happen rather than reconstructed later.

3. Write-Offs: Not Just an Accounting Entry

Under FEMA, a write-off is not a unilateral commercial decision. It is a regulated closure. You are formally notifying the bank and potentially the RBI that a receivable is uncollectable and requesting the export entry be cleaned up accordingly.

The Three-Tier Structure

Write-offs operate within a hierarchy based on who has authority to approve:

• Self write-off by the exporter (within RBI-prescribed limits)
• Write-off by the AD Category-I bank (within its delegated powers)
• RBI approval required when amounts exceed the above limits

The Headline Limits

• Carry Forward of leaves
  • When an employee does not avail themselves of earned leaves (viz one day for every 20 days of work or as mentioned in the Company’s Policy) allowed to them in a year, then such leaves are allowed to be carried forward to next year.
  • Maximum unused earned leaves that can be carried forward is up to 45 days.
  • When the Employer denies the earned leaves applied for, then such employee will be entitled to unlimited carry forward of leaves.
  • No other form of leave, other than earned leave such as sick leave shall be eligible to be carried forward.
• Leave Encashment
  • As per section 15(13) of the Act leaves can be encashed in the following situations:
  • Termination of employment before the employee availed the leaves; or
  • Leave having been denied, the employee quits before taking such leave.
  • Encashed leaves must be paid at a rate equal to daily average of total full-time earnings excluding any overtime or bonus.
  • Leaves should be encashed within 2 days where the employer has terminated the employee. In case where the employee quits, then on or before the next pay day.
  • It is important to note that the Act is silent about encashment of leaves:
    • during the employment; or,
    • when the employee resigns.
  • The law is also silent if the carried forward leaves must be encashed once it exceeds the threshold of 45 days and remains unused.

Analysis

The common question asked around “carry forward” is if less than 45 days of leaves can be carried forward. The law states that the maximum number of leaves that can be carried forward is 45 days. This would lead to two interpretations, i.e., since the law does not prescribe a lower limit, the Company could deny carry forward of leave or alternatively allow up to 45 days of leave to be carried forward. In relation to labor and employment matters, it is now res integra that whenever there are two or more interpretations possible, then the most beneficial interpretation must be adopted (Lalappa Lingappa and Ors. v. Lakshmi Vishnu Textile Mills Ltd. (Civil Appeal No. 930 of 1980). Therefore, in our opinion, carry forward of up to 45 days of leave will be preferred by the executive and judicial authorities.

With regards to encashment of leaves, the law is silent about encashment during employment as well as resignation under normal circumstance. Hence, it may be left to the discretion of the employer whether to grant leave encashment or not.

Encashment and carry forward through the Lens of Labour Codes:

These topics have been made abundantly clear under section 32 of the Occupational Safety and Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020(“OSHW Code” for brevity). It provides for the following:

• Section 32(vii) of the OSHW Code allows for carry forward of leaves up to 30 days of unutilized leave. If any leave applied to and is refused, such leave can be carried forward without any limitation.
• As per Section 32 of the OSHW Code, leave encashment is allowed on the happening of any of the following events –
  • discharge or dismissal or termination
  • resignation
  • superannuation
  • death during the course of calendar year
  • at the end of calendar year, on demand of employee
  • when the carried forward leaves exceeds 30 days, excess leaves shall be encashed
• Leaves must be encashed within 2 working days from the date of discharge, dismissal or quitting and within 2 months in cases of superannuation or death.

Under the new labour codes, given that the leaves can be encashed at the end of each calendar year on demand, it is discretion of the Employer to limit carry forward of leaves to anywhere between 0-30 days. Employers must consider factors like employee well-being, business continuity, financial liability and other such factors while deciding this threshold.

Though provisions related to leave encashment and carry forward have been made abundantly clear now, these provisions under the new labour codes apply to all employees except those employees in managerial, administrative or supervisory capacity/role earning wage more than Rs. 18,000. Per contra, that is to say that for such exempted employees the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961 continues to apply.

Conclusion

Leave encashment and carry forward of leaves are often areas of uncertainty for employers, particularly due to gaps in drafting of the statutes. Under the Act, section 15 is silent regarding the encashment of leave when employee resigns and carry forward of leaves is a question of interpretation. However, these gaps in drafting and interpretations are put to an end in the OSHW Code, wherein the statue has made it clear that up to 30 days of leaves can be carried forward and leaves are encashed on demand, death, superannuation, termination and resignation. Now that the erstwhile state law continues to apply to managerial and supervisory employees and the central code all other employees, the overlap in relation to encashment of leaves and carry forward, therefore, must be dealt with care and caution. Employers must incorporate this overlap harmoniously into their leave policy.

A. Key Overseas Share Swap Structures

1. Indian Company Acquiring a Foreign Target (Outbound Share Swap)

Mechanics

• Indian company acquires shares of the overseas target by issuing its own shares to foreign shareholders of the Target Company.
• Foreign shareholders of the Target Company receive shares of the Indian company (generally the stake is not very huge)
• No cash consideration is paid.

Commercial rationale

• Overseas expansion without deployment of cash.
• Suitable for strategic acquisitions and operating expansions.

2. Overseas Holding Company Formation (Flip or Inversion Structure)

Mechanics

• New Foreign Hold Co. is incorporated
• Existing shareholders of Indian Company exchange their shares in the Indian company for shares in an offshore HoldCo.
• Indian business continues as an operating subsidiary.

Commercial rationale

• IPO driven restructuring.
• Alignment with foreign venture capital or PE expectations.
• Facilitates overseas capital raising and acquisitions.

3. Foreign Company Acquiring an Indian Company via Share Swap

Mechanics

• Foreign Company purchases the shares of the Indian Target Company from the Indian shareholders and issues its shares to them - Foreign company acquires ownership of the Indian company.
• Indian Company becomes the wholly owned subsidiary of the Foreign Company

Commercial rationale

• Enables Indian promoters to participate in global growth.
• Avoids immediate cash exit.
• Useful where the Acquiring Company is a global listed entity.

B. Regulatory Implications (India-Focused)

• FEMA Considerations

Overseas share swaps are permitted under Indian exchange control laws. Some of the key considerations from tax and regulatory perspective have been provided below:

Key regulatory points

• Permitted under the automatic route if sector is open to FDI, pricing guidelines to be complied with. ODI regulations to be complied with especially with respect to limits of financial commitments.
• Valuation must be conducted by a recognised or registered valuer.
• Mandatory reporting through FC-GPR (issuance of shares), FC-TRS (transfer of shares), Form FC (ODI reporting for investment in foreign entity), as the case may be.
• Sectoral caps and downstream investment rules continue to apply.
• Companies Act, 2013

Issuance or transfer of shares through a swap must comply with Indian company law requirements.

Key implications

• Board and shareholder approvals to be obtained.
• Valuation from a registered valuer to be obtained.
• Disclosure and filing obligations apply even in non-cash transactions.
• SEBI Regulations (for Listed Companies)

Where an Indian listed company is involved, securities regulations add another compliance layer.

Key implications

• Preferential allotment pricing norms apply.
• Shareholder approval by special resolution required.
• Lock-in requirements for issued shares.
• Enhanced disclosure obligations under LODR regulations.
• Income-Tax Implications
  • Capital Gains Tax

  For Indian shareholders, a share swap is generally treated as a taxable transfer.

  Key points

  • Capital gains where there is exchange of Indian shares.
  • Consideration to be based on valuation report - Fair market value for the Indian shares transferred. Valuation of Foreign Company shares to be made for the swap
  • Long-term or short-term character depends on holding period.
  • Tax on Issue of Shares (Section 56)

  Where an Indian company issues shares, valuation becomes critical.

  Key points

  • Shares must not be issued below fair market value.
  • Genuine M&A transactions rely heavily on valuation justification.
  • Anti-Avoidance Risks

  Certain structures may attract enhanced scrutiny.

  Key risks

  • GAAR applicability where main purpose is tax avoidance.
  • Place of Effective Management (POEM) risks in holding company structures.
  • Substance, commercial rationale, and governance location are critical.

Overseas Tax and Stamp Duty Considerations

Tax outcomes in the foreign jurisdiction depend on local legislation and treaty benefits.

Typical considerations

• Some jurisdictions tax share swaps. Capital gains exemptions may be available subject to anti-abuse rules.
• Stamp duty on share transfers may apply in India and overseas, depending on jurisdiction.

Conclusion

Overseas share swaps are commercially efficient tools that enable crossborder acquisitions, restructurings, and global expansion without immediate cash outflow. However, their execution requires careful navigation of Indian exchange control rules, company law requirements, and most critically, capital gains tax exposure.

While regulatory permission for share swaps is broadly available, tax neutrality in India is limited and highly structure-dependent. Consequently, successful implementation requires integrated legal, tax and valuation planning, supported by clear commercial substance.

When designed thoughtfully, overseas share swaps can be powerful enablers of longterm value creation; when structured without due care, they can result in significant tax leakage and regulatory risk.